Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Huppert v. Pittsburg, No. 06-17362

By FindLaw Staff on July 21, 2009 3:58 PM

In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action claiming that defendant city violated the First Amendment by disciplining plaintiff police officers based on their speech, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed where the speech at issue was made pursuant to plaintiffs' job duties.

Read Huppert v. Pittsburg, No. 06-17362

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted July 18, 2008

Filed July 21, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Tallman

Dissent by Judge W. Fletcher

Counsel

For Appellants:

Russell A. Robinson, San Francisco, CA

For Appellees:

Joseph M. Quinn, Meyers Nave Riback Silver & Wilson, San Francisco, CA

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard