Huppert v. Pittsburg, No. 06-17362
In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action claiming that defendant city violated the First Amendment by disciplining plaintiff police officers based on their speech, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed where the speech at issue was made pursuant to plaintiffs' job duties.
Read Huppert v. Pittsburg, No. 06-17362
Argued and Submitted July 18, 2008
Filed July 21, 2009
Opinion by Judge Tallman
Dissent by Judge W. Fletcher
Russell A. Robinson, San Francisco, CA
Joseph M. Quinn, Meyers Nave Riback Silver & Wilson, San Francisco, CA
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.