Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Kamm v. ITEX Corp., No. 07-35079

By FindLaw Staff on June 15, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a breach of contract action concerning an Independent Retail Brokerage Service Agreement, the District Court's order remanding the action to state court is affirmed, as Plaintiffs' motion to remand was based on a forum selection clause and thus was not subject to the thirty-day requirement of 28 U.S.C. section 1447(c).

Read the full decision in Kamm v. ITEX Corporation, No. 07-35079.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon. Anna J. Brown, District Judge, Presiding.


Before William A. Fletcher and Raymond C. Fisher, CircuitJudges, and Charles R. Breyer, District Judge. The Honorable Charles R. Breyer, UnitedStates District Judge for the
Northern District of California, sitting by designation.

Opinion by Judge Fletcher.


Stephen A. Redshaw, Stoel Rives LLP, Portland, Oregon, for the appellant.

Christopher L. Garrett, Perkins Coie LLP, Portland, Oregon, for the appellees.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard