Civil Rights
Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Defendant's sentence for illegally reentering the U.S. is vacated where the district court erred in assessing a criminal history point based on Defendant's 2004 state loitering conviction, because Section 4A1.2(c)(2) of the Sentencing Guidelines provides that loitering is not a basis for enhancement.
Read US v. Espinosa, No. 08-50092
Appellate Information
Submitted December 12, 2008
Filed June 24, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Pregerson
Counsel
For Appellant:
Jonathan D. Libby, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Los Angeles, CA
For Appellee:
Brock H. Lunsford, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Domestic Security and Immigration Crimes Section, Los Angeles, CA
Sign into your Legal Forms and Services account to manage your estate planning documents.
Sign InCreate an account allows to take advantage of these benefits: