Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Espinosa, No. 08-50092

By FindLaw Staff | Last updated on

Defendant's sentence for illegally reentering the U.S. is vacated where the district court erred in assessing a criminal history point based on Defendant's 2004 state loitering conviction, because Section 4A1.2(c)(2) of the Sentencing Guidelines provides that loitering is not a basis for enhancement.

Read US v. Espinosa, No. 08-50092

Appellate Information

Submitted December 12, 2008

Filed June 24, 2009


Opinion by Judge Pregerson


For Appellant:

Jonathan D. Libby, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Los Angeles, CA

For Appellee:

Brock H. Lunsford, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Domestic Security and Immigration Crimes Section, Los Angeles, CA

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard