US v. Espinosa, No. 08-50092
Defendant's sentence for illegally reentering the U.S. is vacated where the district court erred in assessing a criminal history point based on Defendant's 2004 state loitering conviction, because Section 4A1.2(c)(2) of the Sentencing Guidelines provides that loitering is not a basis for enhancement.
Read US v. Espinosa, No. 08-50092
Submitted December 12, 2008
Filed June 24, 2009
Opinion by Judge Pregerson
Jonathan D. Libby, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Los Angeles, CA
Brock H. Lunsford, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Domestic Security and Immigration Crimes Section, Los Angeles, CA
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.