Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Medina-Villa, No. 07-50396

By FindLaw Staff on June 23, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Defendant's mail fraud sentence is affirmed where the District Court correctly held that it was precluded from considering evidence of Defendant's post-sentencing rehabilitation in determining whether it would have imposed the same sentence had it known the Sentencing Guidelines were advisory. (Amended opinion)

Read US v. Medina-Villa, No. 07-50396

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted February 3, 2009

Filed May 28, 2009

Amended June 23, 2009


Before: Harry Pregerson, Susan P. Graber, and Kim McLane Wardlaw, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Wardlaw


For Appellant:

Michelle D. Anderson, Law Offices of Michelle D. Anderson, San Diego, CA

For Appellee:

Karen P. Hewitt, United States Attorney, San Diego, CA

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard