Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

US v. Olander, No. 08-30180

FindLaw Staff

Article by: FindLaw Staff

Last updated on

In a child pornography prosecution, denial of defendant's motion to dismiss the charges is affirmed where the crime of receiving child pornography codified at 18 U.S.C. section 2252A(a)(2)(A) does not include intent to distribute among its elements.

Read US v. Olander, No. 08-30180

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted May 5, 2009

Filed July 15, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Fletcher

Counsel

For Appellant:

Amy Baggio, Federal Public Defender's Office, Portland, OR

For Appellee:

Greg Nylus, Office of the United States Attorney, Portland, OR

Michelle Holman Kerin, Office of the United States Attorney, Portland, OR

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
SPONSORED
Copied to clipboard