Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Reed, No. 06-50040

By FindLaw Staff on August 04, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Defendants' drug convictions and sentences are affirmed where: 1) the government's application to wiretap defendants' calls satisfied the necessity requirement; 2) the district court did not err in finding that the government had not intercepted telephone calls on a line for which there was no court order; 3) the government was not required to seal call data content and it timely sealed the wiretap recordings; and 4) the government did not violate the statutory wiretap monitoring requirements of 18 U.S.C. section 2518(5).

Read US v. Reed, No. 06-50040

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted October 24, 2008

Filed August 4, 2009


Opinion by Judge Smith


For Appellant:

Robinson D. Harley, Jr., Santa Ana, California

For Appellee:

Shannon P. Ryan, Assistant United States Attorney for the Central District of California, Los Angeles, CA

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard