Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Reyes, No. 08-10047

By FindLaw Staff on August 19, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a case involving convictions which represented the first criminal convictions for a stock option backdating practice that was widespread in the late 1990s, former Brocade CEO's conviction is reversed due to prosecutorial misconduct in making a false assertion of material fact to the jury in closing argument. Other defendant's conviction is affirmed because sufficient evidence existed to convict her, but her sentence is vacated because it improperly included an obstruction of justice enhancement for which reprehensibility lay primarily with her lawyer.

Read US v. Reyes, No. 08-10047

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted May 12, 2009

Filed August 18, 2009


Opinion by Judge Schroeder


For Appellants:

Seth P. Waxman, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Washington, DC

For Appellee:

Amber Rosen, United States Attorney, San Jose, CA

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard