US v. Ringgold, No. 06-10492
Defendant's firearm possession sentence is affirmed, where a District Court does not abuse its discretion by declining to consider the disparity between a recommended Guidelines sentence and the maximum sentence a defendant would receive if convicted of the same conduct in state court.
Read US v. Ringgold, No. 06-10492
Argued and Submitted December 15, 2008
Filed July 7, 2009
Opinion by Judge Thomas
Barry J. Portman, Federal Public Defender, Oakland, CA
Joseph P. Russoniello, United States Attorney, San Francisco, CA
W.S. Wilson Leung, Assistant United States Attorney, San Francisco, CA
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.