US v. Ruehle, No. 09-50161
In an options backdating prosecution of a former Broadcom executive, the district court's order suppressing all evidence reflecting defendant's statements to attorneys from Broadcom's outside counsel regarding the stock option granting practices at Broadcom is reversed where, by approaching the exclusion question with a presumption that the privilege attached, the district court inverted the burden of proof, improperly placing the onus on the government to show what information was not privileged.
Read US v. Ruehle, No. 09-50161
Argued and Submitted September 1, 2009
Filed September 30, 2009
Opinion by Judge Tallman
Daniel B. Levin, Gregory W. Staples and Andrew D. Stopler, United States
Attorney's Office, Los Angeles, CA
Matthew D. Umhofer, Richard Marmaro and Matthew E. Sloan, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Los Angeles, CA
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.