Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Vernoff v. Astrue, No. 08-55049

By FindLaw Staff on June 17, 2009 12:55 PM

In an appeal from the Social Security Administration's order denying Plaintiff child survivor benefits, the order is affirmed where the child at issue did not meet the eligibility requirements for such benefits because she could not establish that she was dependent upon the deceased insured at the time of his death under California law.

Read the full decision in Vernoff v. Astrue, No. 08-55049.

Appellate Information:

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Cormac J. Carney, District Judge, Presiding.
Argued and Submitted May 6, 2009 -- Pasadena, California
Filed June 17, 2009

Judges:

Before: Cynthia Holcomb Hall, Andrew J. Kleinfeld, and Barry G. Silverman, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Hall

Counsel:

James T. Raetz and Wallace R. Vernoff, Coulter Vernoff & Pearson, Pasadena, California, for the appellant.

Gregory G. Katsas, Assistant Attorney General, and Kelsi Brown Corkran, Attorney, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. for the appellee.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard