Copyright and Immigration Matters
Sumbundu v. Holder, No. 07-3736, involved a petition for review of the BIA's decision affirming an Immigration Judge's (IJ) denial of cancellation of removal on the grounds that petitioners lacked moral character under the "catchall" provision of 8 U.S.C. section 1101(f). The Second Circuit denied the petition, holding that 1) the court had jurisdiction because petitioners raised constitutional claims or questions of law; but 2) intent to commit misconduct was relevant to an IJ's decision that a petitioner lacks good moral character; and 3) misrepresenting a "substantial sum" on a tax return may certainly be a factor in the IJ's moral character determination.
Peter F. Gaito Architecture, LLC v. Simone Dev. Corp., No. 09-2613, concerned a copyright infringement action based on the alleged copying of architectural plans. The court of appeals affirmed the dismissal of the complaint, on the ground that the district court properly considered the question of non-infringement on defendants' motion to dismiss, and did not err in concluding that the complaint -- together with those documents incorporated therein -- failed to adequately allege substantial similarity between defendants' work and the protectible elements of plaintiffs' work.
- Full Text of Sumbundu v. Holder, No. 07-3736
- Full Text of Peter F. Gaito Architecture, LLC v. Simone Dev. Corp., No. 09-2613
- 8 U.S.C. section 1011
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.