Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Dispute Over HIV/AIDS Treatment Grant Program Funding

By FindLaw Staff on May 24, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Also Decided Today: Suit Over Construction of Resort and Contract Case

Hunt Const. Group, Inc. v. Brennan Beer Gorman, No. 08-5603, concerned an action for negligence and negligent misrepresentation against defendant design professionals over allegedly late and erroneous delivery of professional services as part of the construction of a resort.  The Second Circuit certified the following questions to the Vermont Supreme Court:  1) Does the economic loss doctrine bar a contractor from seeking purely economic damages against design professionals who allegedly provided negligent professional services in violation of the design professionals' contractual obligations with a mutual counterparty?  2) Does the economic loss doctrine apply to claims of negligent misrepresentation?

County of Suffolk v. Sebelius, No. 09-3193, involved an action under the Administrative Procedure Act seeking additional funding for fiscal years 2007 and 2008 from a grant program administered by the Department of Health and Human Services ("HHS") pursuant to the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Treatment Modernization Act of 2006.  The court of appeals affirmed the dismissal of the action, holding that the congressional appropriations relating to the funds sought had been lawfully distributed -- and therefore exhausted -- and thus the court of appeals lacked authority to grant effectual relief in the context of an Article III case or controversy.

FCS Advisors, Inc. v. Fair Fin. Co., No. 09-2609, concerned a breach of contract action, in which the district court awarded post-judgment interest to plaintiff.  The Second Circuit vacated the award, holding that post-judgment interest was to be calculated at the federal rate provided for under 28 U.S.C. section 1961(a) where the court's jurisdiction was premised on the diversity of the citizenship of the parties and the contract giving rise to the action contained a choice-of-law provision directing application of New York law.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard