Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Woods v. Empire Health Choice, Inc., No. 07-4208

By FindLaw Staff on July 29, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a private cause of action brought under the Medicare Secondary Payer statute, district court judgment dismissing plaintiff's claim is affirmed where: 1) the court properly held that plaintiff lacks standing to bring the action as he alleged no direct injury to himself and any injury he suffered as a federal taxpayer was too generalized and attenuated to constitute an actual injury to himself; and 2) the Medicare Secondary Payer statute does not create a qui tam action, but rather merely enables a private party to bring an action to recover from a private insurer only where that private party has itself suffered an injury because a primary plan has failed to make a required payment to or on behalf of it. 

Read Woods v. Empire Health Choice, Inc., No. 07-4208

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York.
Argued January 13, 2009
Decided July 29, 2009

Opinion by LIVINGSTON, Circuit Judge.

For Plaintiff: Edward G. Bailey, Bailey & Sherman, P.C., Douglaston, New York.

For Defendant: Daly D.E. Temchine, Epstein Becker & Green, P.C., New York, New York.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard