Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

Huang v. Holder, No. 08-5785

FindLaw Staff

Article by: FindLaw Staff

Last updated on

In a petition for review of the BIA's order denying petitioner's asylum application, the petition is denied where: 1) the BIA's conclusion that an involuntary IUD insertion was not an "involuntary sterilization" was permissible under Chevron; and 2) thus, the BIA's interpretation that a forced IUD insertion is not a per se ground for granting asylum is entitled to deference.

Read Huang v. Holder, No. 08-5785

Appellate Information

Argued November 23, 2009

Filed January 12, 2010

Judges

Per Curiam

Counsel

For Petitioner:

Davi X. Feng, New York, NY

For Respondent:

Kiley L. Kane, Michael F. Hertz and Jennifer L. Lightbody, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
SPONSORED
Copied to clipboard