Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Kiobel v. Millson, No. 07-3903

By FindLaw Staff on January 08, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In an appeal from an order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 sanctioning defense counsel for making factual representations that lacked evidentiary support, the order is reversed where, in light of the record evidence: 1) it was legally erroneous for the magistrate judge to conclude that the statement "there can be no doubt that the witnesses are giving testimony that counsel knows to be false" was utterly lacking in support and therefore sanctionable; and 2) counsel's possible overstatement of the money allegedly sent by plaintiffs' counsel to certain witnesses did not violate Rule 11.

Read Kiobel v. Millson, No. 07-3903

Appellate Information

Argued: January 12, 2009

Decided: January 8, 2010


Opinion by Judge Cabranes


For Appellants:

Rowan D. Wilson, Douglas J. Dixon and Noah J. Phillips, Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP, New York, NY

For Appellees:

Peter Nordberg, Stephen A. Whinston, Carey R. D'Avino, Berger & Montague, P.C., Philadelphia, PA

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard