Kiobel v. Millson, No. 07-3903
In an appeal from an order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 sanctioning defense counsel for making factual representations that lacked evidentiary support, the order is reversed where, in light of the record evidence: 1) it was legally erroneous for the magistrate judge to conclude that the statement "there can be no doubt that the witnesses are giving testimony that counsel knows to be false" was utterly lacking in support and therefore sanctionable; and 2) counsel's possible overstatement of the money allegedly sent by plaintiffs' counsel to certain witnesses did not violate Rule 11.
Read Kiobel v. Millson, No. 07-3903
Argued: January 12, 2009
Decided: January 8, 2010
Opinion by Judge Cabranes
Rowan D. Wilson, Douglas J. Dixon and Noah J. Phillips, Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP, New York, NY
Peter Nordberg, Stephen A. Whinston, Carey R. D'Avino, Berger & Montague, P.C., Philadelphia, PA
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.