Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Loeffler v. Staten Island Univ. Hosp., No. 07-1404

By FindLaw Staff on October 06, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In an action alleging that defendant hospital failed to provide interpreting services to a patient and his wife (both deaf), so that their two children (of normal hearing) had to act as interpreters for their parents, summary judgment for defendant is vacated where: 1) plaintiffs raised a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the hospital acted with deliberate indifference; 2) the children had associational standing under the Rehabilitation Act; and 3) the children's claims under the New York City Human Rights Law were required to be remanded for reconsideration in light of New York City's Local Civil Rights Restoration Act of 2005.

Read Loeffler v. Staten Island Univ. Hosp., No. 07-1404

Appellate Information

Argued: March 19, 2009

Decided: October 6, 2009


Opinion as to Parts I, III and IV by Judge Jacobs

Opinion as to Part II by Judge Wesley

Dissent as to Part II by Judge Jacobs


For Appellants:

Alan J. Rich, Brooklyn, NY

For Appellee:

Roy W. Breitenbach, Garfunkel, Wild & Travis, P.C., Great Neck, NY

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard