Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Read Lafaro v. N.Y. Cardiothoracic Group, PLLC, No. 08-4621

By FindLaw Staff on August 07, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Plaintiffs' itemized bill of costs submitted pursuant to Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 39(d) following a judgment of this court vacating and remanding an order of the district court is construed as an appropriate application for costs and thus granted.    

Read Lafaro v. N.Y. Cardiothoracic Group, PLLC, No. 08-4621

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Argued: March 16, 2009
Decided: August 7, 2009

Before CALABRESI and WESLEY, Circuit Judges, and DRONEY, District Judge.
Per Curium Opinion.

For Plaintiff: RICHARD G. MENAKER, Menaker & Herrmann, LLP, New York, NY.

For Defendant: JORDY RABINOWITZ, Westchester County Health Care Corporation, Valhalla, NY.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard