Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Starbucks Corp. v. Wolfe's Borough Coffee, Inc., No. 08-3331

By FindLaw Staff on December 07, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a trademark infringement action by Starbucks Corp. regarding a competitor's use of the name "Charbucks," judgment for defendant is affirmed in part where: 1) the district court did not clearly err in finding that the Charbucks Marks were minimally similar to the Starbucks Marks; 2) the Charbucks line of coffee was marketed as a product of very high quality -- as Starbucks also purported its coffee to be -- which was inconsistent with the concept of tarnishment. However, the judgment is vacated in part where the district court needed to conduct further proceedings on the issue of whether Starbucks demonstrated a likelihood of dilution by "blurring" under federal trademark law.

Read Starbucks Corp. v. Wolfe's Borough Coffee, Inc., No. 08-3331

Appellate Information

Argued: June 22, 2009

Decided: December 3, 2009


Opinion by Judge Miner


For Appellant:

Mark N. Mutterperl, John C. Rawls and Sarah Silbert, Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P., New York,

For Appellee:

Christopher Cole and John-Mark Turner, Sheehan, Phinney, Bass + Green, P.A., Manchester, NH

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard