Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Transfield ER Cape Ltd. v. Industrial Carriers Inc., No. 09-1733

By FindLaw Staff on July 08, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a dispute involving a maritime attachment and garnishment against a corporate alter ego, district court order vacating the attachment is affirmed where, if a corporation is registered with the New York Department of State and therefore found within the district for the purposes of Rule B of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty and Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions, that corporation's alter egos are also found within the district and the property of those alter egos is not subject to maritime attachment. 

Read Transfield ER Cape Ltd. v. Industrial Carriers Inc., No. 09-1733

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Submitted: May 5, 2009
Decided: July 8, 2009

Before: FEINBERG, WINTER, and CABRANES, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by CABRANES, Circuit Judge.

For Plaintiff: George Michael Chalos, Chalos & Co., P.C., Oyster Bay, NY.

For Defendant: Garth S. Wolfson, Mahoney & Keane, LLP, New York, NY.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard