Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

VIP of Berlin v. Middlebrooks, No. 09-2950

By FindLaw Staff on January 26, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a First Amendment challenge to an ordinance that regulated the operation of sexually oriented businesses, a preliminary injunction in favor of plaintiffs is vacated where the ordinance was sufficiently clear to provide plaintiff-store with notice that the proposed inventory in its zoning application qualified it as a sexually oriented business.

Read VIP of Berlin v. Middlebrooks, No. 09-2950

Appellate Information

Argued: September 15, 2009

Decided: January 25, 2010


Opinion by Judge Straub


For Appellants:

Thomas R. Gerarde and Katherine E. Rule, Howd & Ludorf, LLC, Hartford, CT

For Appellee:

Jennifer M. Kinsley, Sirkin Pinales & Schwartz LLP, Cincinnati, OH

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard