Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Castronovo v. National Union Fire Ins. Co., No. 08-3316

By FindLaw Staff on July 06, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a dispute involving insurance liability coverage, district court judgment is affirmed where defendant is not obligated to indemnify plaintiffs under the consent judgment as defendant did not have a duty to defend and provide coverage to the plaintiffs, and therefore it did not breach any duty and was not estopped from asserting the consent clause as a bar to coverage. 

Read Castronovo v. National Union Fire Ins. Co., No. 08-3316

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, Hammond Division.
Argued: May 15, 2009
Decided: July 6, 2009

Before EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, and BAUER and FLAUM, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by FLAUM, Circuit Judge.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard