Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

U.S. NeuroSurgical, Inc. v. City of Chicago, No. 07-3520

By FindLaw Staff on July 09, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a breach of contract action, district court judgment for defendant is affirmed where: 1) the purported agreement that the project manager entered into with plaintiff on the city's behalf exceeds the limits of the city's power to contract, as the project manager was not the city's procurement officer and had no statutory authority to bind the city in contract, and defendant is charged with knowing the level of authority the project manager actually possessed; 2) any oral modifications to the contract prohibited both by the contract and by statute; 3) the purported contract was prohibited by law and therefore void, and cannot be rendered valid by estoppel or ratification; 4) since the purported modified contract was void for lack of authority, the city was not liable for additional payment, and thus defendant cannot create an original liability on an account stated theory; and 5) the court did not abuse its discretion in awarding costs to the city. 

Read U.S. NeuroSurgical, Inc. v. City of Chicago, No. 07-3520

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division.on.
Argued January 23, 2009
Decided July 9, 2009

Before BAUER, EVANS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by BAUER, Circuit Judge.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard