Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Davis v. Booker, No. 09-1140

By FindLaw Staff | Last updated on

District court's issuance of the writ of habeas corpus for a defendant claiming that the key witness in his murder trial was the shooter who killed the victim is reversed where: 1) the only significant evidence in the record showing what an uncalled witness would have testified, if produced, is a letter that actually implicates defendant for the shooting, not the key witness who testified against him; 2) it is clear from the record that defendant was not prejudiced by his lawyer's failure to locate and call the uncalled witness; and 3) the prosecutor's statements did not constitute improper vouching because the key witness's charge was in the record and his personal interest in the case was obvious to the jury. 

Read Davis v. Booker, No. 09-1140

Appellate Information

Argued: November 19, 2009

Decided and Filed: December 15, 2009


Opinion by Circuit Judge Merritt


For Appellant:   Brian O'Neill, Office of the Michigan Attorney General

For Appellee:    Joan Ellerbusch Morgan

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard