Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Hartman v. Great Seneca Fin. Corp., No. 08-3773

By FindLaw Staff | Last updated on

In an action under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act claiming that Defendants falsely stated in state-court complaints that a certain document was a statement of Plaintiff's account, summary judgment for Defendants is reversed where there was an issue of material fact as to whether Defendants' representations were misleading or deceptive.

Read Hartman v. Great Seneca Fin. Corp., No. 08-3773

Appellate Information

Submitted: June 18, 2009

Decided and Filed: June 30, 2009


Opinion by Judge Moore

Dissenting opinion by Judge White


For Appellants:

Stephen R. Felson, Law Office, Cincinnati, OH

For Appellees:

Michael D. Slodov, Javitch, Block & Rathbone LLP, Cleveland, OH

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard