Hartman v. Great Seneca Fin. Corp., No. 08-3773

In an action under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act claiming that Defendants falsely stated in state-court complaints that a certain document was a statement of Plaintiff's account, summary judgment for Defendants is reversed where there was an issue of material fact as to whether Defendants' representations were misleading or deceptive.

Read Hartman v. Great Seneca Fin. Corp., No. 08-3773

Appellate Information

Submitted: June 18, 2009

Decided and Filed: June 30, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Moore

Dissenting opinion by Judge White

Counsel

For Appellants:

Stephen R. Felson, Law Office, Cincinnati, OH

For Appellees:

Michael D. Slodov, Javitch, Block & Rathbone LLP, Cleveland, OH