Hartman v. Great Seneca Fin. Corp., No. 08-3773
In an action under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act claiming that Defendants falsely stated in state-court complaints that a certain document was a statement of Plaintiff's account, summary judgment for Defendants is reversed where there was an issue of material fact as to whether Defendants' representations were misleading or deceptive.
Read Hartman v. Great Seneca Fin. Corp., No. 08-3773
Submitted: June 18, 2009
Decided and Filed: June 30, 2009
Opinion by Judge Moore
Dissenting opinion by Judge White
Stephen R. Felson, Law Office, Cincinnati, OH
Michael D. Slodov, Javitch, Block & Rathbone LLP, Cleveland, OH
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.