Hartman v. Great Seneca Fin. Corp., No. 08-3773
In an action under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act claiming that Defendants falsely stated in state-court complaints that a certain document was a statement of Plaintiff's account, summary judgment for Defendants is reversed where there was an issue of material fact as to whether Defendants' representations were misleading or deceptive.
Submitted: June 18, 2009
Decided and Filed: June 30, 2009
Opinion by Judge Moore
Dissenting opinion by Judge White
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.