Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Immigration Matter, Plus Suit Against Debt Collector Dismissed

By FindLaw Staff on May 11, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In Hassan v. Holder, No. 09-3243, the Sixth Circuit dealt with a petition for review BIA's final orders in removal proceedings of a Palestinian Muslim couple, born and raised in Jerusalem, Israel.  In granting the petition, the court affirmed in part the decision of the BIA rejecting petitioners' claim that the IJ should have recused herself.  However, the judgment of the Board with respect to its ruling that the government met its burden of proving petitioners were married prior to their entry into the U.S. is reversed, and as such, the Board failed to provide a legally sufficient basis for finding petitioners removable.  Furthermore, the Board's finding that the husband was removable under 8 U.S.C. section 1227(a)(3)(D) is also reversed.   

Ruth v. Unifund CCR Partners, No. 09-3426, concerned a plaintiff's suit against a partnership specializing in debt collection, arising from an underlying suit brought by the partnership against plaintiff to collect a credit card debt allegedly owed to Citibank.  In rejecting the plaintiff's argument that the district court should not have dismissed her suit on statute of limitations grounds, the court upheld the dismissal as plaintiff failed to comply with the one-year statute of limitations and defendant did not fraudulently conceal any information that prevented plaintiff from filing her claim.   

Related Resources:

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard