Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

In re: Nowak, No. 08-3690

By FindLaw Staff on November 13, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceedings, the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's (BAP) denial of plaintiff-creditor's motion to allow an informal proof of claim based on its prior filings as a putative secured creditor is affirmed as the BAP did not abuse its discretion in finding that: 1) plaintiff had ample notice of the likelihood that it would lose its status as a secured creditor, necessitating the filing of a proof of claim; 2) plaintiff's unexplained delay weighed against allowing plaintiff's informal proof of claim; and 3) the large dilution in the distribution to other creditors in this case was an appropriate consideration weighing against allowing plaintiff's claim. 

Read In re: Nowak, No. 08-3690

Appellate Information

Argued: October 13, 2009

Decided and Filed: November 13, 2009


Opinion by Circuit Judge Gilman


For Appellant:  David A. Freeburg, McFadden & Freeburg Co., LPA., Cleveland, Ohio

For Appellee: Lydia Evelyn Spragin, Akron, Ohio

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard