Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Martinez, No. 06-3882

By FindLaw Staff on December 01, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Conviction and sentence of an anesthesiologist, who had operated a pain-management clinic, for health care fraud and related crimes is affirmed where: 1) any error in admitting a video of a doctor performing certain medical procedures was harmless given the overwhelming evidence that defendant was not performing medically necessary procedures and that the procedures were not those for which he was billing, and also considering the weak evidence to the contrary; 2) defendant's claim that admission of the video violated the Confrontation Clause is rejected; 3) there is sufficient evidence to support defendant's conviction for health care fraud under 18 U.S.C. section 1347; 4) there was sufficient evidence for a jury to conclude that defendant committed mail and wire fraud; 5) there is sufficient evidence to to conclude that defendant proximately caused the deaths of two patients; 6) any error in admitting testimony of an addiction specialist was harmless; and 7) defendant's sentence is procedurally and substantively reasonable.     

Read US v. Martinez, No. 06-3882

Appellate Information

Argued: June 16, 2009

Decided and Filed: December 1, 2009


Opinion by Circuit Judge  Cole


For Appellant:  Jonathan P. Witmer-Rich, Federal Public Defender's Office

For Appellee: Nina Goodman, US Department of Justice

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard