Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Roth, 09-5805

By FindLaw Staff | Last updated on
Conviction for violations of the Arms Export Control Act

US v. Roth, 09-5805, concerned a challenge to convictions of defendant for conspiracy, exporting defense articles and services without a license in violation of the Arms Export Control Act, and wire fraud.

In affirming the convictions, the court held that the district court properly concluded that the underlying data and component were defense articles and services pursuant to 22 C.F.R. section 121.1, Category VIII, as the final objective of the project was incorporating plasma actuators into military drones.  The court also held that the district court's jury instruction regarding willfulness was proper.  Further, the district court did not abuse its discretion in declining t deliver defendant's proposed instruction on ignorance of the law as a separate defense.  Lastly, there was sufficient evidence to support defendant's conviction for exporting the Agency Proposal as a rational jury could find beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant knew that the Proposal contained export controlled information.

Related Link:
Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard