Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Action Claiming that BATF Agent Used Excessive Force, and Criminal Matter

By FindLaw Staff on June 04, 2010 3:05 PM

Thomas v. Durastanti, 07-3343, involved an action claiming that a BATF agent violated plaintiff's Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable seizures when the agent shot plaintiff.  The court of appeals reversed the denial of summary judgment based on qualified immunity, holding that a reasonable officer would have had probable cause to believe that there was a threat of serious physical harm to himself or others in the situation presented.

In US v. Adame-Orozco, No. 09-3296, the Tenth Circuit affirmed defendant's conviction for illegally reentering the U.S. after a prior deportation, holding that defendant was never improperly deprived of the opportunity for judicial review in his federal deportation proceedings, because 8 U.S.C. section 1326(d) did not guarantee judicial review in state court of defendant's underlying state felony convictions.

Related Resources

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard