Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Cory v. Allstate Ins., No. 08-2168

By FindLaw Staff on September 09, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In an action for breach of implied contract and defamation based on false statements allegedly made by plaintiff's former employer on an NASD Form U5 regarding plaintiff's termination, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where: 1) defendant's statements on the form were substantially true; and 2) plaintiff could not have reasonably expected that, after defendant began investigating plaintiff for forgery, defendant limited its right to terminate his employment through the nonspecific statements of two employees that "nothing bad would happen."

Read Cory v. Allstate Ins., No. 08-2168

Appellate Information

Filed September 9, 2009


Opinion by Judge Tacha


For Appellant:

Timothy L. White, Valdez and White Law Firm, Albuquerque, NM

For Appellees:

M. Scott Barnard, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Dallas, TX

John V. Jansonius, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Dallas, TX

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard