Hertz v. Luzenac Group, No. 06-1324
In a trade secret misappropriation action, partial judgment for plaintiffs and defendants is affirmed in part where plaintiff failed to present adequate claims of tortious interference with contract and prospective business advantage. The ruling is reversed in part, however, where the question of whether defendant's manufacturing process was a trade secret was a question of fact that could not be resolved on the current record.
Read Hertz v. Luzenac Group, No. 06-1324
Filed August 11, 2009
Opinion by Judge Holmes
Andrew M. Low, Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP, Denver, CO
Janet A. Savage, Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP, Denver, CO
Theresa L. Corrada, Issacson Rosenbaum P.C., Denver, CO
Byeongsook Seo, Issacson Rosenbaum P.C., Denver, CO
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.