Hertz v. Luzenac Group, No. 06-1324

In a trade secret misappropriation action, partial judgment for plaintiffs and defendants is affirmed in part where plaintiff failed to present adequate claims of tortious interference with contract and prospective business advantage. The ruling is reversed in part, however, where the question of whether defendant's manufacturing process was a trade secret was a question of fact that could not be resolved on the current record.

Read Hertz v. Luzenac Group, No. 06-1324

Appellate Information

Filed August 11, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Holmes

Counsel

For Appellant:

Andrew M. Low, Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP, Denver, CO

Janet A. Savage, Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP, Denver, CO

For Appellee:

Theresa L. Corrada, Issacson Rosenbaum P.C., Denver, CO

Byeongsook Seo, Issacson Rosenbaum P.C., Denver, CO