Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
In a drug and firearm prosecution, the denial of plaintiff's Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion claiming that the district court erred in deciding his 28 U.S.C. section 2255 motion for sentence modification without granting him an evidentiary hearing is affirmed where plaintiff's claims required authorization under section 2255(h) as a second or successive motion.
Filed September 16, 2009
Sign into your Legal Forms and Services account to manage your estate planning documents.Sign In
Create an account allows to take advantage of these benefits: