In a drug and firearm prosecution, the denial of plaintiff's Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion claiming that the district court erred in deciding his 28 U.S.C. section 2255 motion for sentence modification without granting him an evidentiary hearing is affirmed where plaintiff's claims required authorization under section 2255(h) as a second or successive motion.
Read In re: Lindsey, No. 09-3184
Appellate Information
Filed September 16, 2009
Judges
Per Curiam
By William Vogeler, Esq. | Last updated on
Prisoners may exercise their rights, but that does not include a right to exercise outside. So said the U.S. Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals in Lowe v....
By Jonathan R. Tung, Esq. | Last updated on
Remember the Atkins diet? One of the low carb diet's most outspoken and enterprising exponents was Dr. Mary C. Vernon of Kansas -- and now she's headed to...
By William Vogeler, Esq. | Last updated on
They are growing more than marijuana in Colorado; they are growing pot law. Adding to a growing body of marijuana decisions, the U.S.Tenth Circuit Court of...
By William Vogeler, Esq. | Last updated on
Prisoners may exercise their rights, but that does not include a right to exercise outside. So said the U.S. Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals in Lowe v....
By Jonathan R. Tung, Esq. | Last updated on
Remember the Atkins diet? One of the low carb diet's most outspoken and enterprising exponents was Dr. Mary C. Vernon of Kansas -- and now she's headed to...
By William Vogeler, Esq. | Last updated on
They are growing more than marijuana in Colorado; they are growing pot law. Adding to a growing body of marijuana decisions, the U.S.Tenth Circuit Court of...