Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

In re: Riebesell, No. 09-1072

By FindLaw Staff on October 28, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a bankruptcy adversary proceeding seeking to prevent the discharge of a debt owed to plaintiff by his attorney (the debtor), judgment for plaintiff is affirmed where: 1) the parties had an attorney-client relationship during the relevant period under Colorado law; 2) the loans to defendant were not "standard commercial transactions" exempt from the requirements of Colo. R. Prof'l Conduct 1.8(a); and 3) the bankruptcy court's finding that defendant had the requisite intent to deceive plaintiff was not clearly erroneous.

Read In re: Riebesell, No. 09-1072

Appellate Information

Filed October 28, 2009


Opinion by Judge O'Brien


For Appellant:

Harold Frederick Riebesell, Jr., Pro Se.

For Appellee:

D. Bruce Coles, Law Office of D. Bruce Coles, Denver, CO

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard