Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Lauck v. Campbell Cty., No. 09-8085

By FindLaw Staff on December 13, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Civil Rights Action by Deputy Sheriff

In Lauck v. Campbell Cty., No. 09-8085, a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action claiming that plaintiff deputy sheriff was improperly transferred and constructively discharged, the court affirmed summary judgment for defendants where 1) plaintiff's claim that he was demoted and constructively discharged in violation of due process failed because he did not produce sufficient evidence that he was constructively discharged, was entitled to a hearing, or was provided an inadequate hearing; and 2) there was no merit to plaintiff's First Amendment claim because he identified only one instance of speech that may be constitutionally protected, and he did not show a causal connection between that speech and the allegedly retaliatory action by defendants.


As the court wrote:  "Contending that he was improperly transferred and constructively discharged, former Deputy Sheriff David Lauck sued Campbell County, the Campbell County Sheriff's Office (CCSO), and Campbell County Sheriff William Pownall (collectively, Defendants). He brought a state-law breach-of-contract claim and civil-rights claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging a denial of procedural due process and retaliation for speech protected by the First Amendment."

Related Resources

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard