Martinez v. Caterpillar, Inc., No. 08-2074
In an action for injuries sustained by plaintiff while attempting to inflate the right-front tire on a motor grader that was designed and manufactured by defendant, judgment for defendant is affirmed where the district court did not err in instructing the jury that defendant could not be liable if the machine's condition had "substantially changed" before the accident.
Read Martinez v. Caterpillar, Inc., No. 08-2074
Filed July 16, 2009
Opinion by Judge Tacha
Jeffrey M. Croasdell, Rodey, Dickason, Sloan, Akin & Robb, P.A., Albuquerque, NM
W.T. Womble, Womble, Howell & Croyle, Houston, TX
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.