Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Peterson v. Grisham, No. 08-7100

By FindLaw Staff on February 02, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a defamation action against author John Grisham based on false statements he allegedly made about plaintiffs in a book, dismissal of the action is affirmed where: 1) any connection between defendants' statements and an accusation of criminal activity was far too tenuous for the court to declare them as unprivileged for purposes of Okla. Stat. 1443.1; and 2) because section 1443.1 applied to plaintiffs' libel claims, plaintiffs were also barred under the statute from asserting a valid claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress or false light.

Read Peterson v. Grisham, No. 08-7100

Appellate Information

Filed February 1, 2010


Opinion by Judge Lucero


For Appellants:

Gary L. Richardson and Denise P. James, The Richardson Law Firm, P.C., Tulsa, OK

For Appellees:

Robert D. Nelon, Hall, Estill, Hardwick, Gable, Golden & Nelson, P.C., Oklahoma City, OK

Cheryl A. Pilate, Morgan Pilate, LLC, Olathe, KS

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard