Allen v. LaSalle Bank, N.A., 09-1466
Allen v. LaSalle Bank, N.A., 09-1466, concerned a challenge to the district court's dismissal of a complaint in concluding that, because plaintiff's attorney protected her form any unfair or unconscionable means used to collect the debt, plaintiff had failed to state viable Federal Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) claims, in plaintiff's class action suit against a law firm, arising from an underlying mortgage foreclosure action against the plaintiff brought by the law firm on behalf of a bank.
In vacating the judgment, the court remanded the matter in concluding that the district court did not have the benefit of plaintiff's concession that her claims were predicated only upon section 1692f(1), which defines the collection of an unauthorized debt as a per se "unfair or unconscionable" debt collection method. Here, the only inquiry under section 1692 is whether the amount collected was expressly authorized by the agreement creating the debt or permitted by law.
- Read the Third Circuit's Full Decision in Allen v. LaSalle Bank, N.A., 09-1466
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.
Or contact an attorney near you: