Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Heleva v. Brooks, No. 07-4118

By FindLaw Staff | Last updated on

District court's denial of defendant's petition for habeas relief is vacated and remanded because the court did not consider the Supreme Court's decision in Pace v. DiGuglielmo, 544 U.S. 408 (2005), in holding that the Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269 (2005) stay-and-abeyance procedure applies exclusively to mixed petitions.  As the Supreme Court has indicated that a petitioner may file a "protective" petition meriting a stay under Pace even where only unexhausted claims are at issue, the case is remanded for the district court to consider whether petitioner has met the stay-and-abeyance standard set out in Rhines and thus should be granted a stay.    

Read Heleva v. Brooks, No. 07-4118

Appellate Information

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (No. 07-cv-1398)
District Judge: Honorable Christopher C. Conner

Opinion Filed September 14, 2009


Before:  Fuentes, Chagares, and Tashima, Circuit Judges 
Opinion by Fuentes, Circuit Judge 


Counsel for Appellant:  J. Nicholas Ranjan

Counsel for Appellee: James F. Marsh, Mark S. Matthews 

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard