Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Invista S.A.R.L. v. Rhodia, SA, 09-2514

By FindLaw Staff | Last updated on

Denial of a motion to dismiss or stay the litigation, for misappropriation of trade secrets of a technology for manufacturing a chemical used in manufacturing nylon, in favor of arbitration

Invista S.A.R.L. v. Rhodia, SA, 09-2514, concerned a challenge to the district court's denial of defendant's motion to either dismiss or stay the litigation in favor of arbitration, in plaintiff's suit for interference with contract, unfair competition, and misappropriation of trade secrets, in connection with a technology for manufacturing a critical intermediate chemical used in manufacturing nylon.

In affirming, the court held that the Tribunal's holding that it does not have jurisdiction over defendant moots this appeal, and given the Tribunal's ruling, it is clear that the district court could not have enforced the arbitration clause as defendant had urged.  Further, because defendant's appeal from the denial of its motion to dismiss under section 3 of the FAA is moot and must be dismissed, its appeal from the district court's denial of its discretionary motion to stay must also be dismissed for lack of pendent appellate jurisdiction.

Related Link:

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard