Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Harris, No. 08-1553

By FindLaw Staff on September 23, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Denial of incarcerated appellant's motion to vacate an order of civil contempt that has been in effect for over five years, which stemmed from a criminal proceeding in which defendant was convicted of conspiracy and fraud and sentenced to 188 months' imprisonment, is affirmed where: 1) the court permissibly structured the order of contempt so that it tolled the commencement of appellant's criminal sentence, such that only if and when the contempt order is lifted will he begin serving that sentence; 2) an order of civil contempt will only become punitive if a contemnor is unable to comply with the order, or if the circumstances indicate that a court is maintaining the contempt for an impermissible punitive purpose; 3) in this case, appellant can comply with the order in question at any time and the order will be lifted. 

Read US v. Harris, No. 08-1553

Appellate Information

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the  District of New Jersey

(D.C. Crim. No. 03-Cr-00354-001)  

District Judge: Honorable Jerome B. Simandle

Opinion Filed September 23, 2009


Before: Barry, Smith, Circuit Judges, and DuBois, District Judge 
Opinion by Barry, Circuit Judge 


Counsel for Appellant:  Edward F. Borden, Jr.

Counsel for Appellee: Norman Gross, George S. Leone

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard