Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

Reed v. International Union, No. 07-2505

FindLaw Staff

Article by: FindLaw Staff

Last updated on

In a Title VII action claiming that Defendant-Union failed to provide a reasonable accommodation for Plaintiff's religious objection to financially supporting the union, summary judgment for Defendant is affirmed where Plaintiff did not show that he suffered any material adverse employment action for making his objection.

Read Reed v. International Union, No. 07-2505

Appellate Information

Argued: September 17, 2008

Decided and Filed: June 23, 2009

Judges

Judge Batchelder delivered the opinion of the Court.

Judge Guy delivered a separate concurring opinion.

Judge McKeague delivered a separate dissenting opinion.

Counsel

For Appellant:

Bruce N. Cameron, National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Springfield, VA

Glenn M. Taubman, National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Springfield, VA

For Appellee:

Barry Macey, Macey, Macey & Swanson, Indianapolis, IN

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
SPONSORED
Copied to clipboard