Find a Qualified Attorney Near You
Find a Qualified Attorney Near You
Search by legal issue and/or location
Enter information in one or both fields. (Required)
Can I Be Charged Twice for the Same Crime in Different States?
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy, clarity, and style by FindLaw’s team of legal writers and attorneys and in accordance with our editorial standards.
The last updated date refers to the last time this article was reviewed by FindLaw or one of our contributing authors. We make every effort to keep our articles updated. For information regarding a specific legal issue affecting you, please contact an attorney in your area.
While law enforcement cannot charge you twice in one state for a single offense, they can charge you twice in different states. For instance, law enforcement can treat your conduct as two (or more) separate criminal acts if your conduct violates the laws of more than one state.
Further, if that conduct was a federal offense, you may be tried and convicted in both a state and federal court. This is known as the "dual sovereignty doctrine," an exception to the "Double Jeopardy Clause" of the U.S. Constitution.
This article discusses how the dual sovereignty doctrine allows for prosecutions by different states without violating the Double Jeopardy Clause. This means multiple states can pursue separate charges for the same criminal act if it violates the laws of each state involved.
Facing charges in two or more states can be particularly complex due to the complexities of double jeopardy laws. Contact a defense attorney near you for expert guidance and help asserting your rights across multiple jurisdictions.
What Is Double Jeopardy?
The constitutional protection against double jeopardy prevents prosecutors from repeatedly bringing the same charges against a defendant. There are many reasons for protection against double jeopardy. Double jeopardy protections are a fundamental right for criminal defendants. They prevent the government from prosecuting someone for the same crime twice.
Double jeopardy is a common law concept dating back to Ancient Greece. The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees this protection to individuals. The Double Jeopardy Clause states that "no person shall . . . be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb."
Acquittals and Mistrials
Suppose law enforcement charges a defendant with sexual assault in Florida. After a jury trial in a state district court, the jury acquits them of their charges. An acquittal means the defendant is found not guilty of charges. Because of the Double Jeopardy Clause, the prosecution cannot prosecute them a second time for the same offense.
Additionally, suppose law enforcement charges the defendant with possession of a controlled substance. Their case is set for a jury trial at the trial court level. The judge ultimately declares a mistrial because of a hung jury.
A mistrial is an exception to the general double jeopardy rule. Thus, in a mistrial, the prosecution can prosecute Dan again. The state could also prosecute any lesser included offenses that police may have charged.
Charges in Multiple States
If a single act violates the law of two states, the law treats the act as separate offenses. Suppose police arrest a suspect for driving under the influence (DUI) in Wisconsin. The suspect later admits they drove from Minnesota to Wisconsin before police pulled them over. Both states could prosecute the suspect for DUI.
Prosecuting the suspect in both states does not conflict with the Double Jeopardy Clause. But, a second state with a case against a defendant may decide that a conviction in the first state is sufficient. Therefore, it does not necessarily mean more than one state will bring charges. The states’ respective prosecutors have the discretion to prosecute the suspect, as they do with all other criminal cases.
Dual Sovereignty Doctrine: Background
The dual sovereignty doctrine states that when a criminal suspect breaks the laws of two different states, the suspect has committed two separate offenses for double jeopardy purposes.
United States v. Lanza
In United States v. Lanza (1922), the defendant was charged with making and distributing alcohol during Prohibition. He was charged with both state and federal crimes. A Washington state court convicted him. The federal government then used the same evidence against him in the federal court case.
The Supreme Court held that the federal prosecution did not violate the defendant’s rights under the Double Jeopardy Clause. The Supreme Court held that state and federal governments were separate sovereigns, and they could prosecute the defendant equally. This became known as the dual sovereignty doctrine.
Heath v. Alabama
Although it was not the first case to address the dual sovereignty doctrine, a 1985 U.S. Supreme Court decision, Heath v. Alabama, added some clarity. In this case, two men, hired by the defendant to murder his wife, kidnapped the victim in Alabama. The victim’s body was later found in Georgia.
One of the defendants pleaded guilty in Georgia in exchange for a sentence of life in prison. In Alabama, he was tried and convicted of murder connected to the kidnapping and was sentenced to the death penalty.
The defendant claimed double jeopardy in defense regarding the Alabama charges. The Supreme Court held that the defendant’s protection against double jeopardy was not violated under the dual sovereignty doctrine:
"The dual sovereignty doctrine provides that when a defendant in a single act violates the ‘peace and dignity’ of two sovereigns by breaking the laws of each, he has committed two distinct ‘offenses’ for double jeopardy purposes."
States are thus considered separate sovereigns under this doctrine. This allows one state court to prosecute a criminal defendant and another state to file a second prosecution for the same crime.
Sentencing Conflicts
Since two or more jurisdictions may convict a defendant for a single criminal act, sentencing conflicts sometimes arise. For example, the defendant in Heath was executed in Alabama in 1992, although he was first sentenced to life in prison by a Georgia court.
Georgia took the defendant’s physical custody first, granting Georgia primary jurisdiction and sentencing priority. Georgia then later likely ceded its primary jurisdiction to Alabama. Under federal law, sentences from different jurisdictions for the same crime may run concurrently or consecutively. The court has discretion regarding the execution of the sentences.
Facing Criminal Charges in More Than One State? Get Legal Help
Legal issues that cross state lines can be challenging to defend. A criminal defense attorney can review your case and provide information regarding the following:
- Double jeopardy protections
- When a new trial is warranted
- Targeted information on how criminal law and criminal procedure apply to your situation
- Dual sovereignty issues
When facing criminal charges of this severity, a criminal defense lawyer can be an invaluable resource in defending your case. An experienced attorney can put their expertise toward fighting for the best possible outcome for you.
Can I Solve This on My Own or Do I Need an Attorney?
- Navigating multiple prosecutions may be too complex without an attorney
- A defense lawyer can seek to reduce or eliminate criminal penalties
- High-stakes criminal defense situations often require professional legal help
An experienced attorney can increase your chances of a favorable outcome in court. Many attorneys offer free consultations.
Stay up-to-date with how the law affects your life
Enter your email address to subscribe

Enter your email address to subscribe
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.
Next Steps
Contact a qualified attorney for legal services focused on criminal charges.
Enter information. (Required)