In Mexico, "La Michoacana" refers to a Michoacan girl holding a specialty ice cream cone in advertisements.
But in Paleteria La Michoacana Inc. v. Productos Lacteos Tocumbo, a federal appeals court said the reference is so commonplace it cannot be claimed by one business over another in the United States. The decision settled a decades-long issue in an international trademark dispute.
Unlike the "paleta" ice cream, however, it was a bittersweet decision. The good news is that you don't have to speak Spanish to understand what happened.
Paleteria
The story started in the 1940s, when the owners of Productos Lacteos Tocumbo claim their ancestors started the first "paleteria" in the Mexican state. That would be "ice cream maker" to non-Spanish speakers.
Paleteria La Michoacana is another paleta company, started by two Mexican-American brothers with pushcarts in the 1990s. Today, the company sells its products at thousands of retail stores throughout the United States.
As the businesses expanded, using various advertisements with "La Michoacana," it got legal. They asked the federal courts to decide who, if anybody, owned the phrase and image.
After cross-motions for summary judgment and a thirteen-day trial, a judge said the U.S. company did not infringe because the phrase is commonplace. The DC Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the ruling against the Mexico-based company on other grounds as well.
Yes and No
The appeals court said "La Michoacana" referred to paleta sales. "[I]n Mexico, the phrase is generally associated with paletas, much as, in the United States, a red, white, and blue striped pole denotes barbershop service rather than any one brand of barber."
On the other hand, the appeals court said Paleteria La Michoacana owned its trademarked image of "La Michoacana," and Productos Lacetos Tocumbo infringed on them. So both companies can use the "La Michoacana" phrase but not the same image.
Entendido?
Related Resources:
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.
By
Robyn Hagan Cain
| Last updated onMarch 21, 2019
Nine-time Olympic medalist Carl Lewis is running again, this time for a New Jersey State Senate.
The Third Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a district court...
By
Casey C. Sullivan, Esq.
| Last updated onMarch 21, 2019
Since Neil Gorsuch's nomination to the Supreme Court this week, commentators have been pouring through his past opinions, looking for insight into who he is as...
Nine-time Olympic medalist Carl Lewis is running again, this time for a New Jersey State Senate.
The Third Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a district court...
Since Neil Gorsuch's nomination to the Supreme Court this week, commentators have been pouring through his past opinions, looking for insight into who he is as...
In Mexico, "La Michoacana" refers to a Michoacan girl holding a specialty ice cream cone in advertisements.
But in Paleteria La Michoacana Inc. v. Productos Lacteos Tocumbo, a federal appeals court said the reference is so commonplace it cannot be claimed by one business over another in the United States. The decision settled a decades-long issue in an international trademark dispute.
Unlike the "paleta" ice cream, however, it was a bittersweet decision. The good news is that you don't have to speak Spanish to understand what happened.