Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Rutti v. Lojack Corp., No. 07-56599

By FindLaw Staff on August 21, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In an action under the Fair Labor Standards Act seeking compensation for the time plaintiff spent commuting to worksites in defendant's vehicles, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed in part where use of an employer's vehicle for commuting is not compensable, but reversed in part where the transmissions plaintiff sent to defendant at the end of the working day may be compensable.

Read Rutti v. Lojack Corp., No. 07-56599

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted February 4, 2009

Filed August 21, 2009


Opinion by Judge Callahan

Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge Hall

Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge Silverman


For Appellants:

John Glugoski, Righetti Law Firm, San Francisco, CA

For Appellee:

Peter D. Holbrook, Los Angeles, CA

Dan Chammas, McDermott Will & Emery LLP, Los Angeles, CA

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard