Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Reiseck v. Universal Comms. of Miami, Inc., No. 09-1632

By FindLaw Staff on January 12, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In an action alleging sex discrimination and failure to pay overtime wages, summary judgment for defendants is vacated in part and the matter is remanded where, because plaintiff's primary duty was the sale of advertising space, she was properly considered a "salesperson" for the purposes of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and therefore did not fall under the administrative exemption to the overtime pay provisions of the FLSA.

Read Reiseck v. Universal Comms. of Miami, Inc., No. 09-1632

Appellate Information

Argued: December 14, 2009

Decided: January 11, 2010


Opinion by Judge Cabranes


For Appellant:

John K. Diviney and Gina Ianne Grath, Alan B. Pearl & Associates, P.C., Syosset, NY

For Appellees:

Dana Susman and S. Reid Kahn, Kane Kessler, P.C., New York, NY

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard