Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Byors, No. 08-4811

By FindLaw Staff on October 29, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Defendant's mail fraud sentence is affirmed where: 1) a defendant is not entitled to an offset against a loss based on business expenses that confer no benefit upon the victims; and 2) Application Note 2(C) to section 2S1.1 of the Sentencing Guidelines does not preclude an enhancement for obstruction of justice pursuant to section 3C1.1 of the Guidelines where a defendant's obstruction relates to an offense underlying a money laundering offense, but not to the money laundering offense itself.

Read US v. Byors, No. 08-4811

Appellate Information

Argued: October 9, 2009

Decided: October 29, 2009


Opinion by Judge Cabranes


For Appellant:

Bradley S. Stetler, Stetler, Allen & Kampmann, Burlington, VT

For Appellee:

Gregory L. Waples, Assistant United States Attorney, District of Vermont, Burlington, VT

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard