Bandak v. Eli Lilly, No. 09-1620
District court's judgment in favor of plaintiff in his ERISA suit against his former employer's retirement plan is affirmed as defendant's rejection of plaintiff's claim was not substantially justified in reducing his benefits under the 1997 amendment after he transferred from the United Kingdom to the US affiliate.
Read Bandak v. Eli Lilly, No. 09-1620
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division
Decided November 18, 2009
Before: Posner, Rovner, and Williams, Circuit Judges
Opinion by Posner, Circuit Judge
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.