Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Bandak v. Eli Lilly, No. 09-1620

By FindLaw Staff on November 18, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

District court's judgment in favor of plaintiff in his ERISA suit against his former employer's retirement plan is affirmed as defendant's rejection of plaintiff's claim was not substantially justified in reducing his benefits under the 1997 amendment after he transferred from the United Kingdom to the US affiliate.   

Read Bandak v. Eli Lilly, No. 09-1620


Appellate Information

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division

Decided November 18, 2009


Before:  Posner, Rovner, and Williams, Circuit Judges

Opinion by Posner, Circuit Judge

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard