Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Dismissal Under Wilton/Brillhart Abstention Doctrine Upheld

By FindLaw Staff on May 12, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Envision Healthcare, Inc. v. PreferredOne Ins. Co., No. 09-2019, concerned an insurance company's third-party suit for indemnification against a wholesale insurance broker in Minnesota state court, arising from a lawsuit brought by an insured for improperly rescinding an insurance policy, and the insurance broker's counterclaim suit against the insurance company in an Illinois federal court. 

The court held that because the third-party proceedings in Minnesota are parallel to the federal case and because it was not an abuse of discretion for the district court to abstain from hearing the declaratory action under the Wilton/Brillhart abstention doctrine, district court's dismissal of the insurance broker's suit against the insurance company in federal court was properly dismissed.       

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard