Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed a lower court's decision to "12(b)(6)" a man's claim that pop star Elton John stole his lyrics for a love song.
Guy Hobbs, the allegedly wronged songrwiter, claimed his lyrics referenced the Cold War and a Communist woman with a name starting with "N."
Hobbs sued Elton John in federal court in Illinois, alleging Elton's 1985 song "Nikita" (which was written by lyricist Bernie Taupin) infringed on a song Hobbs wrote called "Natasha."
Nikita = Natasha?
Hobbs submitted "Natasha" to the same publishing company a couple years prior to "Nikita." Hobbs claimed his song, copyrighted in the United Kingdom, was based on his short rendezvous with a Russian woman he met while working as a cruise ship photographer.
Hobbs identified the following allegedly similar elements that, in his humble opinion, amounted to infringement:
Nikita ≠ Natasha
Ultimately, the court held that Hobbs failed to state a claim for copyright infringement because the songs weren't substantially similar. (Sidenote: If you want to hear substantially similar songs, listen to two Nickelback songs simultaneously. No really, it's a problem.)
The appeals court agreed with the lower court that "Natasha" and "Nikita" simply "tell different stories."
Hobbs' "Natasha" tells the real-life story of a romantic encounter between a man from the UK and a woman from Ukraine, which ends prematurely because the woman "must sail away," the court explained.
By contrast, Elton John's "Nikita" tells the tale of man who sees and loves a woman from afar. But that love can never find physical expression because the two are separated by "guns and gates."
In this case, the standard topic is that of "unrequited love," otherwise known as the bane of pop music.
The Seventh Circuit never got around to evaluating Hobbs' argument that a unique selection, arrangement, and combination of individually unprotectable elements in a song can support a copyright infringement claim.
Which do you think was worse for Hobbs: Finding out there was no copyright infringement or finding out that he's unoriginal?