Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

LaFary v. Rogers Group, Inc., No. 09-1139

By FindLaw Staff on January 12, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In plaintiff's suit against her former employer for age and sex discrimination and retaliation after she was let go for taking more than six months of leave necessitated by complications with her pregnancy, district court's grant of defendant's motion for summary judgment on all counts is affirmed where: 1) district court properly granted motion for summary judgment on plaintiff's claim that a transfer was motivated by pregnancy discrimination as she has not presented evidence that would support a finding that her employer knew that she was pregnant when he decided the transfer; and 2) plaintiff's evidence falls short of raising a genuine issue of fact on her claim that defendant's decisions to terminate her employment and then not to rehire her violated Title VII's prohibitions against pregnancy discrimination and retaliation.     

Read LaFary v. Rogers Group, Inc., No. 09-1139

Appellate Information

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division

Decided January 12, 2010


Before: Flaum, Sykes and Wood, Circuit Judges

Opinion by Circuit Judge Wood

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard